WebMay 3, 2024 · One of the more popular arguments used to show that Jesus is God was argued by two well-known Christian apologists – C.S. Lewis and Josh McDowell – called … WebA trilemma is a difficult choice where there are three different options, and where each option looks unfavorable. One of the earliest uses of the definition of trilemma is that of …
Did you know?
WebLewis's Trilemma falls apart if the Bible isn't an accurate historical record of Jesus' ministry. Which it isn't. Most historians agree that Jesus didn't claim to be God, and that his followers didn't think he was God; this was a later theological innovation. So that dodges the Trilemma right there. 6 MrMostDefinitely • 9 yr. ago Lewis's trilemma is an apologetic argument traditionally used to argue for the divinity of Jesus by postulating that the only alternatives were that he was evil or mad. One version was popularised by University of Oxford literary scholar and writer C. S. Lewis in a BBC radio talk and in his writings. It is sometimes described as the "Lunatic, Liar, or Lord", or "Mad, Bad, or God" argument. It takes the form of a trilemma — a choice among three options, each of which is in some way difficult to …
WebMay 31, 2013 · Epicurus' Trilemma is a famous attack on the existence of God typically attributed to Greek philosopher Epicurus, and quoted by David Hume in the 18th century, … WebJun 8, 2024 · In claiming He was God, Jesus was either: 1) a liar, 2) insane, or 3) God. This is sometimes referred to as “Lewis’s Trilemma.” Lewis’s observation is not only logical but universally applicable, meaning that anyone who claims to be God is either a liar, insane, or God. In this series of articles, we will investigate these possibilities.
WebMar 20, 2015 · The Rock Upon Which The ‘Trilemma’ Is Built Lewis’ famous argument, however, depends on the refutation of another potential explanation of Jesus’ identity which, if shown to be true, can potentially … WebFeb 2, 2024 · A man who said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on a level with the man who says he is a …
WebThe famed C. S. Lewis proposed a now popular trilemma in which Jesus is said to have also declared himself to be God. [1] On the basis of that, it is argued that his claim must be true or else he is “a madman” or “something worse” (popularly, “mad, bad or God”). Lewis’ proposal, however, has two critical flaws: First, his trilemma ...
WebThe Trilemma of Christ “I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I … low soil permeabilityWebApr 13, 2024 · It has been called a theological trilemma. It poses the question; if God is all powerful, and all loving, then why do bad things happen? The question is strong and needs to be answered. The... low soil ph 6-7 is important forWebThe trilemma, then, is the decision among the three equally unsatisfying options. ... Arguments for God usually refer to some form of metaphysically or logically necessary maximally great being distinct from individual deities, although philosophers have also proposed different concepts of God. low solubility coefficientWebSep 20, 2024 · In the previous pieces for this series, we referenced C. S. Lewis’s Trilemma, essentially his argument that: in claiming He was God, Jesus was either a liar, insane, or God. But before we addressed these three possibilities, we provided historical evidence that Jesus actually walked the Earth and actually claimed to be God. jayesh thakkar courseWebApr 9, 2024 · The third option of the trilemma is that Jesus is who he actually claimed to be. Christians say that God proved this by raising Jesus from the dead on Easter Sunday. … low sok yingWebNov 16, 2024 · Here the former atheist presents an argument known as the “Trilemma,” also known as the “Lord, liar, or lunatic” argument (as coined by Josh McDowell). Lewis says: … jayesh shah software testerWebThe Trilemma: Lord, Liar or Lunatic? The atheist website infidels.org hosts a critique of Josh McDowell’s Evidence that Demands a Verdict. The article below responds to Jim … jayesh suthar